| 摘要: |
| 根据《文摘编写规则》(GB6447-86),调查分析1994年或1995年出版的20种期刊20期359篇论文的文摘编写情况。存在的问题主要有:开头的主语是赘语;简单重复论文标题已有的信息;出现不必要的分段、自我评价和本学科常识;参考文献标注方法欠规范,并有缺陷;生物学名用法不规范。认为出现诸多错漏的原因是:作者可能对指示性和报道性两类文摘的作用和编写要求不熟悉,甚至对文摘的含义没有足够的理解;作者在编写文摘时,没有充分考虑文摘所必须具有的客观性、独立性和自含性;某些科技期刊编辑和一些为人之师者可能不熟悉文摘编写国家标准;《文摘编写规则》国家标准中个别词不尽完美;一些读者可能把正式出版物中有讹误的文摘作为标准模式仿照。 |
| 关键词: 科技论文 文摘 文摘编写 |
| DOI： |
| 投稿时间：1995-08-20 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Some Analyses to abstracts of Scientific Papers |
|
Jiang Hanming
|
| (Guangxi Academy of Sciences, of Sciences, Xiyili, Jiangnan Road, Road, Nanning, Guangxi, 530031) |
| Abstract: |
| The abstracting of 359 scientific papers from 20 issues of 20 sorts of scientific periodicalsissued in 1994 or 1995 were analysed based on the Rules for Abstracts and Abstracting (GB6447 86, national standard). The problems were that the subjects in the beginning of the abstracts were superfluous; briefly repeated the messages derived from the papers heading; there were unnecessary of paragraphing, self-evaluation and common knowlege of the study field; the biological nameuseness were incorrect. The reasons were that the authers might not be aware of the different abstracting requirements and functions of the indicative abstracts and the informative ones, and even not understand the meaning of the abstracts; not fully consider the objectivity, independent and self contained of the abstracts during abstracting; some of teachers and editors of scientific journals might be not familiar with the national standard;GB6447-86 still had blemish; some readers might abstract following the incorrect abstracts from the journals. |
| Key words: scientific papers abtracts abstracting |
